<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sabayon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staccatoslur.com/2010/05/07/sabayon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staccatoslur.com/2010/05/07/sabayon/</link>
	<description>An Aesthete to Save Us All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:21:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajani Mgo</title>
		<link>http://staccatoslur.com/2010/05/07/sabayon/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajani Mgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 07:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staccatoslur.com/?p=333#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Oh well, I had some success... In wrecking my system with the crazy emerge command. I&#039;m now running off a reinstall.

I decided instead on a more conservative route though. Selective recompiles should keep my system from being borked while giving me the maximal experiential benefits e.g. recompiling Firefox; KDE etc. instead of recompiling obscure libraries and dependencies I have no idea about.

I managed to genkernel a post-&lt;code&gt;localmodconfig&lt;/code&gt; kernel that has a few other changes from the stock Sabayon one, like the specific optimization for the Pentium4 architectures and selection of a low-latency desktop build. No huge differences I feel on this level yet, if any. I think recompiling the kernel doesn&#039;t really have a huge effect on performance, lest you are talking about drastic recompiles that include some really big patches.

I&#039;m satisfied with my system now, though. Man, I never knew that Linux could be faster. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, I had some success&#8230; In wrecking my system with the crazy emerge command. I&#8217;m now running off a reinstall.</p>
<p>I decided instead on a more conservative route though. Selective recompiles should keep my system from being borked while giving me the maximal experiential benefits e.g. recompiling Firefox; KDE etc. instead of recompiling obscure libraries and dependencies I have no idea about.</p>
<p>I managed to genkernel a post-<code>localmodconfig</code> kernel that has a few other changes from the stock Sabayon one, like the specific optimization for the Pentium4 architectures and selection of a low-latency desktop build. No huge differences I feel on this level yet, if any. I think recompiling the kernel doesn&#8217;t really have a huge effect on performance, lest you are talking about drastic recompiles that include some really big patches.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m satisfied with my system now, though. Man, I never knew that Linux could be faster. <img src='http://staccatoslur.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

